This idea came from one of my Twitter friends, Kate
Hamlin (@Aprl24KT) when I was saying that I needed something to write about.
She threw out a range of topics so I picked the easiest one: how I would I make
the public transportation system in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area better.
(Note: easiest here is to be read as I’ve had a lot of cold medicine and was of
the idea of “Sure! Why not!!)
This is a wide ranging topic regarding funding,
accessibility, availability, property rights, and who knows what else I’m
forgetting. If I’m going to do this right, it’s probably going to be a
multi-post topic. Also, the engineer in me says that I need to fact check, do
research, and cite other sources who know way more about this than I do, and in
general make sure I know what I’m talking about. This initial post will
probably be pretty light in that regard and mostly just get out my opinions and
preconceived notions on what makes in my mind.
The first question that I think needs to be asked
regarding public transit is “What is the goal that you are trying to achieve?”
The obvious answer is move people from point A to point B in the most efficient
manner possible. The devil is always in the details though. While thinking of
the things that I want in a transit system the idea that needs to prevail is “What
will benefit the most people and the least cost?” From that point of view, I’ll
try and lay out my ideas for what I think will help make a better transit
system.
First I think you need to tie the three central cities
together: Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Bloomington with a method that moves a lot
of people at a high rate. We've already achieved the infrastructure with light
rail system. The first change I would make is to ensure that the trains have
priority over automobile traffic. Making sure the trains move through
intersections without needing to stop at red lights will, I believe, increase
ridership and the efficiency of the trains.
The next thing to look at is the number of stops that the
trains make. When the Green Line (Minneapolis Target Field to St. Paul Union
Depot) was first running, there were some complaints that the trains were too slow going between the downtowns. This is a
valid concern IF you look at the trains as express trains between the
downtowns, which would be ideal for executives and suburbanites trying to cross
from the west to the east. If you look at it as a way to move people who live
on or near the line to other spots on or near the line that aren't necessarily
downtown, then it takes on a different purpose.
This is the first spot where I’d really make a change from what we have now. I
think during a rush hour that you need a couple of express trains that run
between the downtowns and the airport. Three or four stops at one end, three or four at the
other, and then just cruise through the middle without slowing down (again,
traffic timing needs to be fixed to allow this). If I had my way (and it’s my
blog so I do) I’d probably add a third rail that just runs the express trains.
Maybe you don’t need it though if you can get the timing down.
This seems like a good place to break this post up at. My
next post will focus on how I would change the routes with the suburbs, both
bus and train. As always, feel free to add any thoughts you have to the
comments.
It's like you're inside my brain, but with more detail, because I never even thought about the logistics. I completely agree with every single thing here.
ReplyDeleteThe connection of the three big cities makes so much sense considering how massive Bloomington is. I would add more suburban out shoots from there, like they're planning to do with the Bottineau line to Maple Grove. For example Bloomington-Eden Prairie-Chanhassen; Mpls-SLP-Hopkins-Wayzata etc.
And the speed of the LRT system here has consistently been an issue for me. One of the things I love about the metro systems in Boston, NYC, and Paris is the speed in which you get from one point of the city to another. You're absolutely right that it's about changing the priority status from cars to trains. In order to encourage ridership, you need to offer an alternative that gets people looking at their cars as the secondary option.